Facts About valid marriage pakistani case law Revealed

“There is not any ocular evidence to show that Muhammad Abbas was murdered by any of your present petitioners. Mere fact that Noor Muhammad and Muhammad Din noticed firstly the deceased and after a long way they saw the petitioners going towards the same direction, didn't suggest that the petitioners were chasing the deceased or were accompanying him. Such evidence cannot be treated as evidence of previous viewed.

fourteen. Within the light on the position explained previously mentioned, it is concluded that a civil servant contains a fundamental right to get promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but couldn't be regarded as for no fault of his possess and meanwhile he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency while in the size of service or within the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 269 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

four.  It has been noticed by this Court that there is usually a delay of sooner or later within the registration of FIR which has not been explained by the complainant. Moreover, there isn't any eye-witness of your alleged event and the prosecution is counting on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession of the petitioners has actually been tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of them namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram happened to get the real brothers of the deceased but they did not respond whatsoever to your confessional statements of the petitioners and calmly noticed them leaving, one after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not search much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on fourteen.02.2018 and there is not any explanation as to why her arrest was not effected after making of your alleged extra judicial confession. It has been held on a great number of occasions that extra judicial confession of an accused is usually a weak type of evidence which may be manoeuvred with the prosecution in any case where direct connecting evidence does not appear their way. The prosecution is likewise depending on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal didn't say a word as to presence of some light for the place, where they allegedly observed the petitioners together over a motorcycle at 4.

While there is not any prohibition against referring to case law from a state other than the state in which the case is being heard, it holds minimal sway. Still, if there isn't any precedent while in the home state, relevant case legislation from another state could possibly be deemed by the more info court.

very long period petitioner wasn't deemed for promotion, meeting from the departmental promotion committee and think about the petitioner (Promotion)

Please use 1 username and password established from the options. If it does not work please try out the other. Each allows single person access only - so please remember to log off properly when you have finished your session in Manupatra.

be established without an iota of doubt in all other jurisdictions) will be inferred. This is actually a horrifying reality, an especially very low threshold for an offence that carries capital punishment.

This guide provides worthwhile insights into free online resources offering access to Pakistani case regulation, helping you navigate the complexities of legal research.

On June sixteen, 1999, a lawsuit was filed on behalf on the boy by a guardian ad litem, against DCFS, the social worker, as well as therapist. A similar lawsuit was also filed on behalf of your Roe’s victimized son by a different guardian advertisement litem. The defendants petitioned the trial court to get a dismissal based on absolute immunity, as they were all performing in their jobs with DCFS.

Justia – an extensive resource for federal and state statutory laws, and also case legislation at both the federal and state levels.

Finally, a significant contribution of this case which was accepted for consideration from the Court under Article 184 (3), has actually been setting a precedent which allows for much less complicated access towards the public to technique the superior courts and the subordinate courts on environment related issues.

کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟

Persuasive Authority – Prior court rulings that might be consulted in deciding a current case. It may be used to guide the court, but is just not binding precedent.

Finding reliable free case law sites may be challenging. Many websites require subscriptions or offer limited information. This article helps you navigate the landscape of free case regulation resources in Pakistan, furnishing you with a curated list of reliable and accessible platforms.